Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Nemotron 3 Super (medium) leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.5. Nemotron 3 Super (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.055 vs $0.068. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 4.12s vs 51.99s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 37.9%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5-ProIts score stays close to the best score here (5.5 vs 5.7), while responding about 12.6x faster than Nemotron 3 Super (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Nemotron 3 Super Nemotron 3 Super medium Release: 2026-03-11 Free Available MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.7 5.5
Rank #146 #160
Reliability 8.7 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 37.9%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.004 1.509
Total Cost $0.055 $0.068
Input Price $0.080 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $0.450 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 81,429 124,799
Output Tokens 18,371 15,362
Reasoning Tokens 98,853 0
Response Time (avg) 51.99s 4.12s
Response Time (max) 431.98s 53.13s
Response Time (total) 1039.89s 90.55s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#146 Nemotron 3 Super

medium
Cost
$0.000
Time
272.6s
Tokens
5,296 tok

#160 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3 Super 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 147.32s 2,275 797 4,424
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair