Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next leads on average score with 5.1 vs 4.7. Qwen3 Coder Next has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.032. Qwen3 Coder Next is faster at 9.12s vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder NextIt has the strongest score in this comparison (5.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next none Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.7 5.1
Rank #202 #180
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 25.8%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.793 0.488
Total Cost $0.032 $0.025
Input Price $0.110 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 148,194 134,218
Output Tokens 19,069 11,808
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 9.61s 9.12s
Response Time (max) 81.80s 45.14s
Response Time (total) 153.69s 145.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#202 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#180 Qwen3 Coder Next

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.058
Time
246.3s
Tokens
64,126 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,442 621 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair