Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Flash

Summary

Qwen3.7 Max vs MiMo-V2-Flash benchmark comparison: MiMo-V2-Flash leads on average score with 7.1 vs 6.9. MiMo-V2-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.043 vs $0.054. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 1.30s vs 20.11s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 65.1%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.7 Max - Its score stays close to the best score here (6.9 vs 7.1), while responding about 15.5x faster than MiMo-V2-Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 MiMo-V2-Flash MiMo-V2-Flash medium Release: 2025-12-16
Score 6.9 7.1
Rank #69 #62
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 65.1%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.744 0.343
Total Cost $0.054 $0.043
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $3.750 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,107 40,111
Output Tokens 1,994 12,476
Reasoning Tokens 0 125,039
Response Time (avg) 1.30s 20.11s
Response Time (max) 3.92s 96.01s
Response Time (total) 27.21s 301.59s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#69 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#62 MiMo-V2-Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.020
Time
284.1s
Tokens
65,689 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.08s 696 242 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 8.1 7.9 83.3% 1 15.85s 621 1,674 23,559
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 10.71s 7,177 474 13,505
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.17s 9,549 171 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 75.68s 18,676 442 26,859
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.35s 7,794 243 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 0ms 2,622 153 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 975ms 789 15 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 5.9 7.2 55.6% 1 96.01s 739 8,374 42,461
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.04s 522 120 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.20s 492 87 488
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 943ms 711 72 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.28s 678 75 3,504
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.13s 714 314 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.87s 670 864 1,948
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.92s 8,211 222 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 27.78s 8,220 321 12,715
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 856ms 210 13 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.96s 216 12 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair