Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max vs StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 6.0. Step 3.5 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.108 vs $0.197. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 174.22s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 51.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIt has the best score here (7.4), while responding about 38.5x faster than Step 3.5 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-02-01
Score 7.4 6.0
Rank #67 #141
Reliability 9.9 9.2
Consistency 10.0 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 51.5%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.582 0.540
Total Cost $0.197 $0.108
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 95,983 65,707
Output Tokens 12,446 108,561
Reasoning Tokens 0 293,993
Response Time (avg) 4.52s 174.22s
Response Time (max) 72.30s 1597.85s
Response Time (total) 99.52s 2613.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#141 Step 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
277.1s
Tokens
23,695 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
Step 3.5 Flash 2.4 5.2 0.0% 0 258.38s 2,211 13,207 22,429

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair