Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5 Nano (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 6.1. GPT-5 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.114 vs $0.197. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 54.87s, with pass rates of 56.1% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
273,098
Response Time (avg)
54.87s
Total Cost
$0.114
Rank
#67
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.4), while responding about 12.1x faster than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 6.1 7.4
Rank #139 #67
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.0 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.1% 68.2%
Flaky tests 8 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.267 1.582
Total Cost $0.114 $0.197
Input Price $0.050 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,935 95,983
Output Tokens 12,042 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 261,056 0
Response Time (avg) 54.87s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 227.89s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 822.99s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#139 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair