Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

gpt-oss-120b (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.197. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 21.91s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
97,816
Response Time (avg)
21.91s
Total Cost
$0.019
Rank
#67
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.4), while responding about 4.8x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 6.1 7.4
Rank #132 #67
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.0 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 68.2%
Flaky tests 5 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.221 1.582
Total Cost $0.019 $0.197
Input Price $0.037 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $0.170 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,747 95,983
Output Tokens 29,772 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 68,044 0
Response Time (avg) 21.91s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 68.16s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 328.70s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#132 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair