Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Flash

Summary

Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiMo-V2-Flash benchmark comparison: Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.023 vs $0.043. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 2.85s vs 20.11s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 65.1%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.7 Plus - It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 1.9x less than MiMo-V2-Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03 MiMo-V2-Flash MiMo-V2-Flash medium Release: 2025-12-16
Score 7.2 7.1
Rank #61 #62
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 65.1%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.276 0.343
Total Cost $0.023 $0.043
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.280 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,510 40,111
Output Tokens 6,578 12,476
Reasoning Tokens 0 125,039
Response Time (avg) 2.85s 20.11s
Response Time (max) 29.38s 96.01s
Response Time (total) 59.86s 301.59s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#61 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

#62 MiMo-V2-Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.020
Time
284.1s
Tokens
65,689 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.38s 696 349 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 8.1 7.9 83.3% 1 15.85s 621 1,674 23,559
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 10.71s 7,177 474 13,505
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 29.38s 14,952 4,505 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 75.68s 18,676 442 26,859
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.43s 7,794 243 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 0ms 2,622 153 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 868ms 789 18 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 5.9 7.2 55.6% 1 96.01s 739 8,374 42,461
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.3 10.0 0.0% 0 1.33s 522 78 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.20s 492 87 488
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 929ms 711 72 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.28s 678 75 3,504
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 1.71s 714 443 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.87s 670 864 1,948
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.54s 8,211 222 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 27.78s 8,220 321 12,715
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.21s 210 9 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.96s 216 12 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair