Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Flash

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 6.3. MiMo-V2-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.043 vs $0.661. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 20.11s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 62.1%.

Recommended modelClaude Sonnet 4.6It has the best score here (7.3), while responding about 2.5x faster than MiMo-V2-Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 MiMo-V2-Flash MiMo-V2-Flash medium Release: 2025-12-16
Score 7.3 6.3
Rank #71 #124
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 62.1%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 5.502 0.343
Total Cost $0.661 $0.043
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 40,111
Output Tokens 19,362 12,476
Reasoning Tokens 0 125,039
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 20.11s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 96.01s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 301.59s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#124 MiMo-V2-Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.020
Time
284.1s
Tokens
65,689 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
MiMo-V2-Flash 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 10.71s 7,177 474 13,505

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair