Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra (low) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.3. GPT-5.6 Terra (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.519 vs $0.661. GPT-5.6 Terra (low) is faster at 5.31s vs 8.12s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 74.2%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 Terra (low)It has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 1.5x faster than Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra low Release: 2026-07-09
Score 7.3 7.5
Rank #60 #53
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 74.2%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 3.989
Total Cost $0.661 $0.519
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $15.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 80,295
Output Tokens 19,362 4,714
Reasoning Tokens 0 16,469
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 5.31s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 19.85s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 116.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#53 GPT-5.6 Terra

low
Cost
$0.034
Time
16.8s
Tokens
2,348 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 9.56s 7,302 429 6,821

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair