Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) vs Grok 4.20 (medium)

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.1. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $0.777. Grok 4.20 (medium) is faster at 29.47s vs 36.80s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#80
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Rank
#90
Total Output Tokens
259,340
Response Time (avg)
29.47s
Total Cost
$0.777
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 18.8x less than Grok 4.20 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28 Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 medium Release: 2026-03-31
Score 7.3 7.1
Rank #80 #90
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.4 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 63.6%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.346 9.709
Total Cost $0.042 $0.777
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 92,182 102,791
Output Tokens 14,287 5,363
Reasoning Tokens 282,962 253,977
Response Time (avg) 36.80s 29.47s
Response Time (max) 394.54s 199.66s
Response Time (total) 809.54s 648.35s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#80 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#90 xAI: Grok 4.20

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
110.3s
Tokens
16,336 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419
Grok 4.20 6.3 6.6 55.6% 1 109.93s 8,307 268 103,150

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair