Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) vs Grok 4.3 (medium)

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.1. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $0.779. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 36.80s vs 47.45s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Rank
#83
Total Output Tokens
241,421
Response Time (avg)
47.45s
Total Cost
$0.779
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 18.8x less than Grok 4.3 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28 Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 medium Release: 2026-05-01
Score 7.3 7.1
Rank #75 #83
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.4 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.346 5.990
Total Cost $0.042 $0.779
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 92,182 140,031
Output Tokens 14,287 13,739
Reasoning Tokens 282,962 227,682
Response Time (avg) 36.80s 47.45s
Response Time (max) 394.54s 216.69s
Response Time (total) 809.54s 1043.83s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#75 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#83 xAI: Grok 4.3

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
19.0s
Tokens
3,661 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419
Grok 4.3 5.9 7.7 44.4% 1 41.23s 8,340 1,028 31,226

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair