Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

LongCat 2.0 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

LongCat 2.0 (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $0.478. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 36.80s vs 136.64s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#69
Total Output Tokens
373,396
Response Time (avg)
136.64s
Total Cost
$0.478
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while costing about 11.5x less than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.4 7.3
Rank #69 #75
Reliability 9.8 9.9
Consistency 8.9 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.978 0.346
Total Cost $0.478 $0.042
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 97,315 92,182
Output Tokens 44,384 14,287
Reasoning Tokens 329,012 282,962
Response Time (avg) 136.64s 36.80s
Response Time (max) 939.52s 394.54s
Response Time (total) 3006.01s 809.54s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#69 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

#75 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair