Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.1. Qwen3 Coder Next has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.061. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 9.12s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 25.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Rank
#180
Total Output Tokens
11,808
Response Time (avg)
9.12s
Total Cost
$0.025
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 1.7x faster than Qwen3 Coder Next.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next none Release: 2026-02-03
Score 5.3 5.1
Rank #175 #180
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 25.8%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.496 0.488
Total Cost $0.061 $0.025
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,979 134,218
Output Tokens 46,957 11,808
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.52s 9.12s
Response Time (max) 39.54s 45.14s
Response Time (total) 110.40s 145.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

#180 Qwen3 Coder Next

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.058
Time
246.3s
Tokens
64,126 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,442 621 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair