Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Laguna S 2.1 (medium) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.1. Qwen3 Coder Next has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.059. Qwen3 Coder Next is faster at 9.12s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder NextIts score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.4), while costing about 2.4x less than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next none Release: 2026-02-03
Score 5.4 5.1
Rank #164 #174
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.4 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 25.8%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.451 0.488
Total Cost $0.059 $0.025
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 86,641 134,218
Output Tokens 97,298 11,808
Reasoning Tokens 242,297 0
Response Time (avg) 58.43s 9.12s
Response Time (max) 560.31s 45.14s
Response Time (total) 1285.48s 145.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

#174 Qwen3 Coder Next

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.058
Time
246.3s
Tokens
64,126 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
Qwen3 Coder Next 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,442 621 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair