Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Summary

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs MiMo-V2.5 benchmark comparison: Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.063 vs $0.146. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 18.08s vs 27.11s, with pass rates of 63.5% vs 69.8%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5 - Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while costing about 2.3x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 7.4 7.3
Rank #46 #56
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.5% 69.8%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.094 2.966
Total Cost $0.146 $0.063
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 16,385 41,838
Output Tokens 19,632 2,827
Reasoning Tokens 130,219 198,898
Response Time (avg) 18.08s 27.11s
Response Time (max) 86.11s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 343.61s 569.38s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#46 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#56 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 6.02s 672 1,154 12,385
MiMo-V2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.14s 621 281 1,739
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
MiMo-V2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 16.86s 15,060 363 7,609
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.99s 7,776 2,591 9,968
MiMo-V2.5 2.7 5.7 16.7% 1 6.33s 7,746 306 5,714
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 22.50s 771 6,193 39,116
MiMo-V2.5 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 34.53s 735 507 49,478
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 8.66s 516 129 4,569
MiMo-V2.5 5.4 2.5 66.7% 1 5.37s 492 121 418
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.50s 699 219 7,404
MiMo-V2.5 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 1.80s 672 88 801
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 8.0 10.0 66.7% 0 5.95s 696 655 9,228
MiMo-V2.5 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 20.25s 660 279 33,254
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
MiMo-V2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.29s 8,220 303 2,424
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 32.90s 204 762 10,326
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 51.29s 210 22 15,484

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair