Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium)

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.4. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.052 vs $0.672. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is faster at 1.56s vs 58.49s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 57.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-08

Compared models

Rank
#178
Total Output Tokens
14,161
Response Time (avg)
1.56s
Total Cost
$0.052
Rank
#172
Total Output Tokens
743,292
Response Time (avg)
58.49s
Total Cost
$0.672
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.4 vs 6.6), while costing about 13.0x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Release: 2026-03-03 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.4 6.6
Rank #178 #172
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 57.6%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.430 6.212
Total Cost $0.052 $0.672
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.900 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 120,955 85,148
Output Tokens 14,161 61,736
Reasoning Tokens 0 681,556
Response Time (avg) 1.56s 58.49s
Response Time (max) 9.27s 817.57s
Response Time (total) 34.32s 1169.83s
Parameters ~150B total (~10B active) 35B total (3B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#178 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.7s
Tokens
1,827 tok

#172 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 967ms 8,128 670 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumMercury 2.5 PreviewhighvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumDots 3 Note PreviewlowFree AvailablevsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnoneDots 3 Note PreviewhighFree AvailablevsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnoneGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsLing-3.0-flashhighLongCat 2.0highvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsLaguna XS 2.1mediumFree AvailableGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsQwen3.6 27BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsRing-2.6-1Tmedium