Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) vs Step 3.7 Flash (low)

Step 3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 6.7. Step 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.454 vs $0.746. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 20.68s vs 58.06s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
740,585
Response Time (avg)
58.06s
Total Cost
$0.746
Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
376,581
Response Time (avg)
20.68s
Total Cost
$0.454
Recommended model Step 3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 1.6x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 6.7 7.3
Rank #98 #75
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.712 3.782
Total Cost $0.746 $0.454
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 85,139 103,833
Output Tokens 61,819 376,581
Reasoning Tokens 678,766 0
Response Time (avg) 58.06s 20.68s
Response Time (max) 817.57s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 1161.18s 455.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#98 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#75 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair