Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.073. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 25.28s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
209,201
Response Time (avg)
25.28s
Total Cost
$0.073
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 6.8x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #136 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 34.9%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.933 0.935
Total Cost $0.073 $0.062
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 282,347 139,788
Output Tokens 209,201 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 25.28s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 480.96s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 556.24s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#136 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair