Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.5-9B vs MiMo-V2.5

The average score is effectively tied at 4.9 vs 4.9. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.041 vs $0.049. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 9.88s vs 37.19s, with pass rates of 18.8% vs 26.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-19

Compared models

Rank
#362
Total Output Tokens
70,427
Response Time (avg)
37.19s
Total Cost
$0.041
Rank
#361
Total Output Tokens
33,960
Response Time (avg)
9.88s
Total Cost
$0.049
Recommended model MiMo-V2.5

It has the best score here (4.9), while responding about 3.8x faster than Qwen3.5-9B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 4.9 4.9
Rank #362 #361
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.8% 26.1%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.022 1.246
Total Cost $0.041 $0.049
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.003 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 307,670 276,608
Output Tokens 70,427 17,693
Reasoning Tokens 0 16,267
Response Time (avg) 37.19s 9.88s
Response Time (max) 433.02s 124.23s
Response Time (total) 855.27s 227.24s
Parameters 9B 310B total (15B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#362 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#361 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Switch Comparison Pair