Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.122. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is faster at 12.72s vs 13.56s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-35B-A3BIt has the strongest score in this comparison (6.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #138 #137
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 43.9%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.578 1.636
Total Cost $0.106 $0.122
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 134,521 94,468
Output Tokens 86,614 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 12.72s 13.56s
Response Time (max) 209.15s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 279.90s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#138 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
28.4s
Tokens
4,518 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair