Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.6 vs 6.6. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.749. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.77s vs 58.49s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 57.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#146
Total Output Tokens
24,323
Response Time (avg)
4.77s
Total Cost
$0.058
Rank
#150
Total Output Tokens
743,292
Response Time (avg)
58.49s
Total Cost
$0.749
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B

It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 12.9x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.6 6.6
Rank #146 #150
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 57.6%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.678 6.212
Total Cost $0.058 $0.749
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 102,325 85,148
Output Tokens 24,323 61,736
Reasoning Tokens 0 681,556
Response Time (avg) 4.77s 58.49s
Response Time (max) 69.46s 817.57s
Response Time (total) 105.00s 1169.83s
Parameters 27B 35B total (3B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#146 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

#150 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair