Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs xAI: Grok 4.20

Laguna S 2.1 (low) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.1. Grok 4.20 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.057 vs $0.091. Grok 4.20 is faster at 1.11s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelLaguna S 2.1 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 none Release: 2026-03-31
Score 5.0 4.1
Rank #187 #213
Reliability 9.9 N/A
Consistency 7.8 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 27.3%
Flaky tests 6 0
Total Runs 66 54
Cost per result 3.022 1.570
Total Cost $0.091 $0.057
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,746 41,313
Output Tokens 67,823 1,923
Reasoning Tokens 383,885 0
Response Time (avg) 85.35s 1.11s
Response Time (max) 814.73s 6.04s
Response Time (total) 1877.64s 19.96s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

#213 xAI: Grok 4.20

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
6.5s
Tokens
1,367 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138
Grok 4.20 1.1 3.1 0.0% 0 1.22s 1,074 312 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair