Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Laguna S 2.1 (low) vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.0. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.061 vs $0.091. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#187
Total Output Tokens
451,708
Response Time (avg)
85.35s
Total Cost
$0.091
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 1.5x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.0 5.3
Rank #187 #175
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.8 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 31.8%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.022 1.496
Total Cost $0.091 $0.061
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,746 93,979
Output Tokens 67,823 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 383,885 0
Response Time (avg) 85.35s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 814.73s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 1877.64s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair