Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 3.7. gpt-oss-120b has the lower benchmark cost at $0.010 vs $0.061. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 21.61s, with pass rates of 33.3% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#222
Total Output Tokens
51,664
Response Time (avg)
21.61s
Total Cost
$0.010
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 3.9x faster than gpt-oss-120b.

Detailed comparison

Metric gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b none Release: 2025-08-05 Free Available Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 3.7 5.3
Rank #222 #175
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.8 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 33.3% 31.8%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 57 66
Cost per result 0.168 1.496
Total Cost $0.010 $0.061
Input Price $0.037 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.170 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 9,081 93,979
Output Tokens 51,664 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 21.61s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 113.71s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 345.79s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#222 gpt-oss-120b

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
gpt-oss-120b 1.5 4.0 22.2% 1 9.57s 901 3,232 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair