Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 leads on average score with 4.5 vs 3.7. gpt-oss-120b has the lower benchmark cost at $0.010 vs $0.025. Laguna S 2.1 is faster at 11.67s vs 21.61s, with pass rates of 33.3% vs 15.2%.

Recommended modelLaguna S 2.1It has the best score here (4.5), while responding about 1.9x faster than gpt-oss-120b.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b none Release: 2025-08-05 Free Available Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 3.7 4.5
Rank #216 #200
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.8 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 33.3% 15.2%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 57 66
Cost per result 0.168 1.205
Total Cost $0.010 $0.025
Input Price $0.037 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.170 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 9,081 125,598
Output Tokens 51,664 57,634
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 21.61s 11.67s
Response Time (max) 113.71s 200.52s
Response Time (total) 345.79s 256.80s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#216 gpt-oss-120b

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
gpt-oss-120b 1.5 4.0 22.2% 1 9.57s 901 3,232 0
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair