Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Mistral: Mistral Small 4 vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Mistral Small 4 (medium) leads on average score with 5.1 vs 4.5. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.096. Mistral Small 4 (medium) is faster at 10.77s vs 11.67s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 15.2%.

Recommended modelMistral Small 4 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Mistral Small 4 Mistral Small 4 medium Release: 2026-03-16 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.1 4.5
Rank #175 #200
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 15.2%
Flaky tests 8 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.913 1.205
Total Cost $0.096 $0.025
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 140,494 125,598
Output Tokens 39,462 57,634
Reasoning Tokens 92,362 0
Response Time (avg) 10.77s 11.67s
Response Time (max) 59.15s 200.52s
Response Time (total) 236.94s 256.80s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#175 Mistral Small 4

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
47.9s
Tokens
9,857 tok

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mistral Small 4 4.4 5.1 33.3% 2 39.98s 7,636 11,635 54,715
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair