Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.8. GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.041. GPT-5.4 Nano is faster at 2.57s vs 9.15s, with pass rates of 28.8% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#201
Total Output Tokens
13,794
Response Time (avg)
2.57s
Total Cost
$0.041
Rank
#197
Total Output Tokens
22,992
Response Time (avg)
9.15s
Total Cost
$0.016
Recommended model GPT-5.4 Nano

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 4.9), while responding about 3.6x faster than GLM 4.7 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano none Release: 2026-03-17 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.8 4.9
Rank #201 #197
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 28.8% 34.9%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.011 0.256
Total Cost $0.041 $0.016
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $1.250 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 115,924 101,504
Output Tokens 13,794 22,992
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.57s 9.15s
Response Time (max) 25.50s 97.15s
Response Time (total) 56.51s 137.18s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#201 GPT-5.4 Nano

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
46.1s
Tokens
5,735 tok

#197 GLM 4.7 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,305 613 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 2.54s 7,256 650 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair