Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.920. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 16.96s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIt offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (7.4), lower cost than GPT-5.3-Codex (medium), and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric GPT-5.3-Codex GPT-5.3-Codex medium Release: 2026-02-05 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 8.9 7.4
Rank #18 #67
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.6 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 68.2%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.748 1.582
Total Cost $0.920 $0.197
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 81,268 95,983
Output Tokens 6,251 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 49,274 0
Response Time (avg) 16.96s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 100.93s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 373.19s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#18 GPT-5.3-Codex

medium
Cost
$0.049
Time
54.9s
Tokens
3,580 tok

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.3-Codex 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 19.50s 7,302 535 10,890
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair