Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.2 (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.4. GPT-5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.951 vs $1.143. GPT-5.2 (medium) is faster at 22.62s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#27
Total Output Tokens
54,782
Response Time (avg)
22.62s
Total Cost
$0.951
Rank
#25
Total Output Tokens
169,940
Response Time (avg)
67.53s
Total Cost
$1.143
Recommended model GPT-5.2 (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.4 vs 8.4), while responding about 3.0x faster than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium Release: 2025-12-11 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.4 8.4
Rank #27 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.5 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.791 8.173
Total Cost $0.951 $1.143
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,004 79,240
Output Tokens 9,914 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 44,868 164,842
Response Time (avg) 22.62s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 102.93s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 339.28s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#27 GPT-5.2

medium
Cost
$0.047
Time
49.2s
Tokens
3,396 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.73s 7,302 511 11,912
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair