Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.584 vs $1.143. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) is faster at 9.48s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 81.8% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.1 vs 8.4), while costing about 2.0x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.1 8.4
Rank #34 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.5 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.8% 80.3%
Flaky tests 7 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.169 8.173
Total Cost $0.584 $1.143
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,138 79,240
Output Tokens 8,315 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 212,507 164,842
Response Time (avg) 9.48s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 43.93s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 208.52s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#34 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair