Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Fable 5 (medium) leads on average score with 8.6 vs 8.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.584 vs $3.478. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) is faster at 9.48s vs 17.20s, with pass rates of 78.8% vs 81.8%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.1 vs 8.6), while costing about 6.0x less than Claude Fable 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Release: 2026-06-10 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21
Score 8.6 8.1
Rank #22 #34
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.8% 81.8%
Flaky tests 1 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 20.459 4.169
Total Cost $3.478 $0.584
Input Price $10.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $50.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,643 105,138
Output Tokens 41,360 8,315
Reasoning Tokens 10,269 212,507
Response Time (avg) 17.20s 9.48s
Response Time (max) 80.80s 43.93s
Response Time (total) 378.41s 208.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 Claude Fable 5

medium
Cost
$0.606
Time
156.7s
Tokens
12,264 tok

#34 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair