Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.584 vs $1.477. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 7.61s vs 9.48s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 81.8%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21
Score 8.7 8.1
Rank #18 #31
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 81.8%
Flaky tests 1 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.201 4.169
Total Cost $1.477 $0.584
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,252 105,138
Output Tokens 24,948 8,315
Reasoning Tokens 5,042 212,507
Response Time (avg) 7.61s 9.48s
Response Time (max) 65.40s 43.93s
Response Time (total) 159.91s 208.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#18 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair