Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.1. Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.143 vs $1.694. Muse Spark 1.1 (high) is faster at 31.49s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.1 8.4
Rank #27 #19
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.9 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 64 66
Cost per result 14.116 8.173
Total Cost $1.694 $1.143
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,423 79,240
Output Tokens 8,077 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 352,421 164,842
Response Time (avg) 31.49s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 196.03s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 661.28s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#27 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

#19 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair