Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Muse Spark 1.1 (high) leads on average score with 8.1 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.213 vs $1.694. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 31.49s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.8 vs 8.1), while costing about 8.0x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.1 7.8
Rank #27 #36
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 7.9 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 64 63
Cost per result 14.116 2.159
Total Cost $1.694 $0.213
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,423 37,199
Output Tokens 8,077 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 352,421 49,500
Response Time (avg) 31.49s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 196.03s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 661.28s 488.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#27 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

#36 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair