Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

GPT-5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.296 vs $0.951. GPT-5.2 (medium) is faster at 22.62s vs 62.65s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.2 (medium)It has the best score here (8.4), while responding about 2.8x faster than GLM 5.2 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium Release: 2025-12-11 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.4 8.0
Rank #21 #31
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 71.2%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.791 5.873
Total Cost $0.951 $0.296
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.293 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $0.920 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,004 83,813
Output Tokens 9,914 69,688
Reasoning Tokens 44,868 225,659
Response Time (avg) 22.62s 62.65s
Response Time (max) 102.93s 599.43s
Response Time (total) 339.28s 1378.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#21 GPT-5.2

medium
Cost
$0.047
Time
49.2s
Tokens
3,396 tok

#31 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.73s 7,302 511 11,912
GLM 5.2 6.4 8.6 33.3% 0 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair