Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) leads on average score with 8.5 vs 8.0. Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.175 vs $0.667. GLM 5.2 (high) is faster at 37.09s vs 47.07s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 77.8%.

Recommended modelSeed-2.0-Lite (medium)It has the best score here (8.5), while costing about 3.8x less than GLM 5.2 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium Release: 2026-02-14 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.5 8.0
Rank #21 #32
Reliability 10.0 9.3
Consistency 9.0 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 77.8%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.250 4.255
Total Cost $0.175 $0.667
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.929 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $2.918 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 46,740 34,993
Output Tokens 3,230 51,575
Reasoning Tokens 78,406 166,065
Response Time (avg) 47.07s 37.09s
Response Time (max) 254.92s 180.69s
Response Time (total) 988.37s 778.91s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#21 Seed-2.0-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
86.7s
Tokens
2,354 tok

#32 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 8.0 9.8 66.7% 0 156.74s 8,247 458 31,890
GLM 5.2 6.4 4.4 77.8% 2 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair