Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.584 vs $0.951. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) is faster at 9.48s vs 22.62s, with pass rates of 81.8% vs 72.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.1 vs 8.4), while costing about 1.6x less than GPT-5.2 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21 GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium Release: 2025-12-11
Score 8.1 8.4
Rank #34 #27
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.8% 72.7%
Flaky tests 7 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.169 6.791
Total Cost $0.584 $0.951
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,138 105,004
Output Tokens 8,315 9,914
Reasoning Tokens 212,507 44,868
Response Time (avg) 9.48s 22.62s
Response Time (max) 43.93s 102.93s
Response Time (total) 208.52s 339.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#34 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

#27 GPT-5.2

medium
Cost
$0.047
Time
49.2s
Tokens
3,396 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
GPT-5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.73s 7,302 511 11,912

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair