Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) leads on average score with 8.1 vs 7.8. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.405 vs $0.584. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) is faster at 9.48s vs 43.12s, with pass rates of 81.8% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)It has the best score here (8.1), while responding about 4.5x faster than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.1 7.8
Rank #31 #41
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.8% 71.2%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.169 1.514
Total Cost $0.584 $0.405
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,138 97,689
Output Tokens 8,315 6,412
Reasoning Tokens 212,507 184,825
Response Time (avg) 9.48s 43.12s
Response Time (max) 43.93s 291.55s
Response Time (total) 208.52s 905.53s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

#41 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair