Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.6 Plus (medium)

Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.060 vs $0.405. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) is faster at 43.12s vs 49.75s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 71.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#57
Total Output Tokens
168,165
Response Time (avg)
49.75s
Total Cost
$0.060
Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
191,237
Response Time (avg)
43.12s
Total Cost
$0.405
Recommended model DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while costing about 6.8x less than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #57 #48
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 71.2%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.402 1.514
Total Cost $0.060 $0.405
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Output Price $0.280 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,392 97,689
Output Tokens 14,478 6,412
Reasoning Tokens 153,687 184,825
Response Time (avg) 49.75s 43.12s
Response Time (max) 218.13s 291.55s
Response Time (total) 1094.41s 905.53s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#57 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
93.1s
Tokens
7,926 tok

#48 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair