Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.294 vs $0.341. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 15.74s vs 30.70s, with pass rates of 69.8% vs 68.3%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while responding about 1.9x faster than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.8 7.7
Rank #38 #51
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.8% 68.3%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.831 2.840
Total Cost $0.294 $0.341
Input Price $0.325 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.950 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 41,565 40,101
Output Tokens 1,853 289,325
Reasoning Tokens 141,973 0
Response Time (avg) 30.70s 15.74s
Response Time (max) 201.68s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 613.99s 330.63s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#38 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

#51 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair