Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) leads on average score with 8.1 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $0.584. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) is faster at 9.48s vs 23.28s, with pass rates of 81.8% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)It has the best score here (8.1), while responding about 2.5x faster than GLM 5.2 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.1 7.8
Rank #31 #42
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 7.5 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.8% 80.3%
Flaky tests 7 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 4.169 2.159
Total Cost $0.584 $0.187
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.808 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $2.539 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,138 37,199
Output Tokens 8,315 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 212,507 49,500
Response Time (avg) 9.48s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 43.93s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 208.52s 488.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

#42 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair