Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium)

GPT-5.2 Chat leads on average score with 8.0 vs 6.7. GPT-5.2 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.604 vs $0.746. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 58.06s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 60.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#37
Total Output Tokens
30,424
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$0.604
Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
740,585
Response Time (avg)
58.06s
Total Cost
$0.746
Recommended model GPT-5.2 Chat

It has the best score here (8.0), while responding about 7.6x faster than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.0 6.7
Rank #37 #98
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 60.6%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.308 5.712
Total Cost $0.604 $0.746
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,248 85,139
Output Tokens 30,424 61,819
Reasoning Tokens 0 678,766
Response Time (avg) 7.65s 58.06s
Response Time (max) 38.52s 817.57s
Response Time (total) 168.39s 1161.18s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#37 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

#98 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair