Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Summary

Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads on average score with 6.3 vs 5.8. Kimi K2.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.079 vs $0.401. Kimi K2.6 is faster at 13.27s vs 72.57s, with pass rates of 36.5% vs 69.8%.

Recommended model: Kimi K2.6 - Its score stays close to the best score here (5.8 vs 6.3), while costing about 5.1x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none Release: 2026-04-20 Free Available Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 5.8 6.3
Rank #115 #88
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.5% 69.8%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.267 5.162
Total Cost $0.079 $0.401
Input Price $0.680 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $3.410 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 32,916 42,196
Output Tokens 16,410 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 353,577
Response Time (avg) 13.27s 72.57s
Response Time (max) 238.89s 409.98s
Response Time (total) 278.57s 1524.04s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#115 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

none
Cost
$0.020
Time
127.4s
Tokens
4,429 tok

#88 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 4.6 10.0 25.0% 0 1.39s 618 471 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 21.13s 672 798 42,652
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 82.57s 5,986 14,754 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.38s 11,269 290 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 4.7 1.6 66.7% 1 75.34s 20,992 775 12,485
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.32s 7,014 201 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7.3 5.9 83.3% 1 59.33s 6,061 235 19,493
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 1.48s 732 42 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 4.1 4.4 44.5% 2 88.34s 500 41 46,368
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.4 3.5 33.3% 1 1.55s 477 138 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 30.30s 172 20 3,753
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.64s 669 72 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 24.45s 699 97 17,361
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 3.1 9.9 0.0% 0 1.40s 651 185 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 33.13s 597 3,592 26,585
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.46s 5,286 240 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.65s 8,193 309 1,365
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.36s 214 17 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 177.35s 204 10,919 72,053

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair