Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MiniMax M3 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.6. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.286. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) is faster at 39.77s vs 74.98s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#55
Total Output Tokens
251,469
Response Time (avg)
74.98s
Total Cost
$0.286
Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
359,703
Response Time (avg)
39.77s
Total Cost
$0.051
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 5.7x less than MiniMax M3 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric MiniMax M3 MiniMax M3 medium Release: 2026-06-01 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.6 7.8
Rank #55 #48
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 8.0 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 72.7%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.376 0.387
Total Cost $0.286 $0.051
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 121,990 116,322
Output Tokens 77,916 12,332
Reasoning Tokens 173,553 347,371
Response Time (avg) 74.98s 39.77s
Response Time (max) 431.03s 431.47s
Response Time (total) 1574.56s 875.01s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#55 MiniMax M3

medium
Cost
$0.012
Time
154.4s
Tokens
10,018 tok

#48 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M3 6.1 6.5 55.6% 1 144.74s 5,804 6,223 32,667
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair