Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MiniMax M2.7 (medium) vs GPT-5.4 Nano

MiniMax M2.7 (medium) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.8. GPT-5.4 Nano has the lower benchmark cost at $0.041 vs $0.176. GPT-5.4 Nano is faster at 2.57s vs 41.28s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 28.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-07

Rank
#205
Total Output Tokens
137,594
Response Time (avg)
41.28s
Total Cost
$0.176
Rank
#214
Total Output Tokens
13,794
Response Time (avg)
2.57s
Total Cost
$0.041
Recommended model GPT-5.4 Nano

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 5.0), while costing about 4.3x less than MiniMax M2.7 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 medium Release: 2026-03-18 GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano none Release: 2026-03-17
Score 5.0 4.8
Rank #205 #214
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.6 8.2
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 28.8%
Flaky tests 9 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.906 1.011
Total Cost $0.176 $0.041
Input Price $0.270 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.080 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,518 115,924
Output Tokens 18,558 13,794
Reasoning Tokens 119,036 0
Response Time (avg) 41.28s 2.57s
Response Time (max) 196.21s 25.50s
Response Time (total) 866.81s 56.51s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#205 MiniMax M2.7

medium
Cost
$0.022
Time
22.8s
Tokens
9,250 tok

#214 GPT-5.4 Nano

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
46.1s
Tokens
5,735 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 5.7 9.1 33.3% 0 101.89s 2,961 1,231 38,841
GPT-5.4 Nano 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,305 613 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair