Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Summary

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) leads on average score with 8.0 vs 7.8. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.310 vs $1.440. Muse Spark 1.1 (high) is faster at 29.16s vs 73.79s, with pass rates of 69.8% vs 73.0%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)It has the best score here (8.0), while costing about 4.6x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Release: 2026-02-15
Score 7.8 8.0
Rank #41 #37
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.8% 73.0%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 61 63
Cost per result 11.997 2.445
Total Cost $1.440 $0.310
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 64,900 40,918
Output Tokens 3,577 2,159
Reasoning Tokens 316,055 189,604
Response Time (avg) 29.16s 73.79s
Response Time (max) 196.03s 266.69s
Response Time (total) 583.18s 1033.07s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

#37 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

medium
Cost
$0.011
Time
125.5s
Tokens
7,040 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 6.6 7.1 44.4% 1 180.70s 6,950 420 80,595

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair