Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 6.3. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $1.253. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 10.13s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 86.4%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20 GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24
Score 6.3 9.3
Rank #111 #6
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 86.4%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.627 6.594
Total Cost $0.044 $1.253
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,743 80,058
Output Tokens 9,372 5,378
Reasoning Tokens 0 23,040
Response Time (avg) 5.18s 10.13s
Response Time (max) 48.38s 56.19s
Response Time (total) 113.95s 222.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

#6 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair