Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

LongCat 2.0 leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.044. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 21.91s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 50.0%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 4.2x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05
Score 6.3 6.1
Rank #111 #121
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 50.0%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.627 0.221
Total Cost $0.044 $0.019
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.037 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.170 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,743 108,747
Output Tokens 9,372 29,772
Reasoning Tokens 0 68,044
Response Time (avg) 5.18s 21.91s
Response Time (max) 48.38s 68.16s
Response Time (total) 113.95s 328.70s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

#121 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair