Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.3. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.621. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 16.26s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 36.4%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0Its score stays close to the best score here (6.3 vs 6.5), while costing about 14.1x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low Release: 2026-05-08 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.5 6.3
Rank #105 #111
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 36.4%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.170 0.627
Total Cost $0.621 $0.044
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,224 108,743
Output Tokens 7,759 9,372
Reasoning Tokens 390,126 0
Response Time (avg) 16.26s 5.18s
Response Time (max) 318.02s 48.38s
Response Time (total) 357.64s 113.95s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#105 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

low
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.0s
Tokens
1,479 tok

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.53s 8,132 471 1,072
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair