Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.6. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.048 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 8.42s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#161
Total Output Tokens
66,174
Response Time (avg)
8.42s
Total Cost
$0.048
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.2x faster than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 6.1
Rank #161 #135
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 34.9%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.593 0.935
Total Cost $0.048 $0.062
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 51,472 139,788
Output Tokens 7,822 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 58,352 0
Response Time (avg) 8.42s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 48.19s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 185.24s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#161 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair